Thursday, July 17, 2014

Weird Al, the Grammar Snob Loves You!

Why? Because of this:



That's all.

P.S. Pet writing-related peeve of the day:

People whose email signature line includes "Thanks," as an automatic sign off. Seriously. "Thanks" is not always the appropriate conclusion to your email message - it is not a universal closing, and can look pretty weird depending on the actual content of the email body. Also, it reeks of laziness and insincerity.

Thanks,
The Grammar Snob

Thursday, April 24, 2014

Permanantly


Permanantly closed, eh?

This sign, on the wall of the old gym at my workplace (across the hall from my office), has a little problem. Unfortunately, it's permanant, since this sign isn't going anywhere anytime soon.

The best part, though? The little "e" that someone (not me) drew above the errant "a" on the sign. I love the fact that someone else in my workplace cares enough to engage in guerrilla proofreading.

Tuesday, April 1, 2014

Journalists Who Can't Write


It's an epidemic. And we're not immune here in the Beehive State.

Check out this double-whammy from the Deseret News. It wasn't enough that the photo caption read "For the second year in a year..." - which is a feat of chronological contortionism - but the lead sentence begins with a construction that's nearly as bad: "For the second year in a row..."

Sorry to break this to you, Deseret News, but two items do not make a "row." Three in a row, yes. Two in a row? Nope. That would be, "For the second year running..." or "For the second consecutive year.." or even "For the second straight year..." But...NO ROWS FOR YOU! Not until you have three items or more.

UPDATE: And......they did it again!


Thursday, December 5, 2013

People Who Should Know Better

At the launch of this blog, I mentioned that I would mostly highlight the writing faux pas of other communication professionals - that is, I would mostly refrain from picking on the uninitiated. Of course, I have, on occasion, pointed out some egregious writing from laypeople, simply because I couldn't resist. And they were funny.

So, in returning somewhat to my charter, I want to point out (without naming names, Jake Freivald) that one should try to pick a side and be consistent.

That is, if you want to write like a Brit, I'm sure there's room for you across the pond. But as an American communication professional, I recommend adherence to an American style guide. You don't even need to pick one style guide. I mean, I float freely among AP, Chicago, AMA, or even the corporate style guide du jour - that is, I happily flex to please my clients. And when writing fiction, I stick with Generally Accepted American English (GAAE). Yes, I made that up. And, of course, there are exceptions for accented dialogue, poetry, etc.

So, why do I bring this up? Because when you are writing in the United States, for a mostly American audience, your commas and periods belong inside the quotation marks. This is not a matter of personal preference.

"That is all."


Monday, December 2, 2013

Review Time


Here's a fun review I found on Amazon for a product that you plug into your cigarette lighter in the car so you can play music from your phone.

Creeps popping out if my blugin
By nathen l smith on December 2, 2013
Can't see the screen much but that is not needed rilly and it pops out of the blugin in my car but good sound I can't find a longer cord for it thow and the cord is only like 1ft

Based on that, I think I will not be buying it. I mean, who wants creeps popping out of their blugins?

Don't Let 'Em Win, People!


Friday, July 5, 2013

Commagain?

Okay, grammar geeks, cast your vote: to Oxford, or not to Oxford? Personally, I am an absolute Oxfordian.

The Oxford Comma
Courtesy of: OnlineSchools.com